A new film on active measures is on its way!

Directed by a guy whose dad is married to Harvey Weinstein’s old buddy, Anna Wintour, and featuring the likes of John Dean, ALEXANDRA CHALUPA and Asha Rangappa…This is ONE film you should be sure to, um, miss.

2018: The year films about active measures are, themselves, active measures.  LOL, it’s almost like Russia isn’t even trying anymore. So fucking lame.

Maybe I WILL watch it, so I can rip it the hell apart.

* COMING SOON * Semion Mogilevich, the Russian Mafia Kingpin Who Owns Wall Street, Who You’ve Never Heard Of

Defamation Lawsuits

Defamation Lawsuits


(Looks at watch)

Shady Hedgefund Manager Revered By Trump Just Threatened a FISC Judge (and Twitter suspended the account that brought it to your attention)

Shady Hedgefund Manager Revered By Trump Just Threatened a FISC Judge (and Twitter suspended the account that brought it to your attention)

I am OUTRAGED today.


Yesterday, a 20 year old, alt-Right hedgefund manager (with a personal history that would make your skin crawl) literally DOXXED AND THREATENED A UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT JUDGE!!!



And in order to make this insult to Democracy even worse, Twitter temporarily suspended an account that reported Jacob Wohl and informed the Twittersphere of Wohl’s SEDITIOUS tweets, forcing the account to delete the tweet.

Not that I’m particularly shocked by Twitter’s handling of this, since I know a few things about Twitter that, unfortunately, most people are not ready to hear about yet.

But I want to share a few things with you about the seditious scumbag Jacob Wohls.

First off, here’s Jacob’s “Everipedia” page.

And allow me to be the first to tell you that there’s something VERY WRONG with Everipedia and its Iranian-American President and co-founder, Sam Kazemian.

For those who may have forgotten, Everipedia got its fifteen minutes of fame when their Meredith McIver page(which had been created two days earlier) was blasted across Twitter as supposed evidence that this apparently nonexistent person actually exists. To date, no one has ever met Meredith McIver. She remains a Trump campaign ledger book entry and little more.

Anyway, not only was Wohl ordered to pay a fine of $32,000 to the Arizona Corporation Commission, WHICH HE DID NOT PAYhe and his company, NEX Capital Management LLC have also been permanently banned by the National Futures Association.

But we know that Donald Trump is a fan of Jacob Wohl if we can safely assume that Trump or his Russian government friends control his tweets…

But it gets even better.
It turns out, Jacob Wohl’s father was formerly an attorney at the Los Angeles law firm, Wallin and Klarich. Since it seems apparent to me that some of Wallin and Klarich’ dirty history has been scrubbed off the Internet, I have taken the courtesy to provide a little more information.
One of Wallin and Klarich’ areas of expertise is the defense of those accused of rape.
Here’s a news article explaining about that time one of their attorneys spent 90 days in jail for altering a psychology report that was prepared for one of their clients they were defending:
Anyway, Jacob’s father made it to the big leagues. He’s parted ways with the “defenders of those accused of rape” law firm and he’s now a regular contributor to Fox News.
Everybody loves happy endings, right?
And behind my justified outrage and sarcasm are a few comments about Russian organized crime, which I will save for another day.
More History You’re Not Going To Like: If We Play Russia’s Identity Politics Game, We’re Going To Lose

More History You’re Not Going To Like: If We Play Russia’s Identity Politics Game, We’re Going To Lose

For most folks, the topic of active measures is a fairly new concept.
So if you’re new to all of this, let me be the first to inform you that Russian active measures did not begin in 2016. They didn’t even begin in 2008.  This has been going on for over 100 years.  But for Kremlinologists and some members of the intelligence community, this is old news. It’s a topic that, historically, really hasn’t interested most people. And for some in academia, it has always warranted skepticism and even contempt.
From my perspective, I find this very curious since one really can’t understand reality without understanding Russia’s active measures. It’s been said that the world’s best Russia experts understand the WORLD, because Russia’s use of active measures is so global and pervasive in nature. Active measures are and have been a central component of Russian foreign policy for a very long time, as was also the case with Soviet foreign policy before it.
In a sense, the Kremlin made a strategic blunder by so blatantly attacking the integrity of the 2016 elections, attacking Hillary Clinton’s campaign and doing their part to ensure Trump’s success. The political left-wing has now experienced, firsthand, what some have spoken about for many decades, only to be laughed off as paranoid John Birch Society groupies. Having said that, some of the greatest “anti-Communists” and opponents of Soviet active measures were unapologetic left-wingers.
But the game is shifting before our very eyes. And the Kremlin is gaining the upper hand again, this time with the 2020 elections in their sights. And, frankly, I’m getting worried.
In my opinion, we’ve now reached or will shortly reach a point in which the Trump administration poses a lesser risk to national security than the two-fold risk of Trump’s phony opposition and Trump’s grassroots supporters. In fact, I can already see the battlefield coming into view.
If one looks at the alt-Right as a sort of extension of Russian intelligence, which is how I kind of look at it, they may at first appear to be white nationalists, fascists and neo-Nazis. But this notion falls apart when one sees how the alt-Right intersects with the alt-Left.  At the end of the day, what we have are far right and far left agitators who intersect based upon shared economic interests. Such is the game of Russian active measures and their over-reliance upon “Horseshoe Theory”, as I have explained in previous articles.
The same fallacy exists with regard to Bannon and Trump and their supposed antisemitism. In fact, it’s preposterous to believe that a couple guys who surround themselves with Russian Jewish mafia thugs in Palm Beach are really antisemites.
And yet these incorrect and misleading narratives are prevalent in the “Resistance” movement.
As a Conservative “NeverTrumper”, I’m as irate at the GOP as anyone on the Left…perhaps even more so since they have nearly destroyed my party altogether. Unfortunately, I have watched as certain key individuals in the “Resistance” have taken that same narrative and extended it to the GOP and Conservatives themselves. While I can understand the temptation, I want to share a few details from history that I hope will demonstrate the dangers of both identity politics and partisan politics.
My case will likely elicit some strong emotions. So I ask you to please bear with me while I present my case, which is going to take some time here. I do not defend or admonish either the GOP or the Democratic Party. I merely want to try to present history as it actually happened, with a mind for understanding the role of active measures in U.S. history. My hope is that there are a few surprises in my arguments, and we all come a little closer to the center and to each other.
A look at political divisions in Congress in the late 1950s and early 1960s (source):
85th Congress, 1957-1959
49 Democrats
47 Republicans
234 Democrats
201 Republicans
86th Congress, 1959-1961
64 Democrats
34 Republicans
283 Democrats
153 Republicans
88th Congress, 1963-1965
67 Democrats
33 Republicans
258 Democrats
176 Republicans
OK. Here’s the part you might not like…
VOTES-Civil Rights Act of 1957
Democrats:   119 Yea (50.85%) 107 Nay (45.7%)
Republicans: 167 Yea (83%)     19 Nay (9.5%)
VOTES-Civil Rights Act of 1960
Democrats:   165 Yea (58.3%) 82 Nay (29%)
Republicans: 123 Yea (80.4%) 12 Nay (8%)
VOTES-Civil Rights Act of 1964
Democrats:   153 Yea (59.3%) 91 Nay (35.3%)
Republicans: 136 Yea (77.3%) 35 Nay (19.9%)
Democrats:   46 Yea (68.7%) 21 Nay (31.3%)
Republicans: 27 Yea (81.8%) 6  Nay (18.2%)
Some of you were already familiar with those numbers. Others will quickly want to discuss Barry Goldwater, who was one of the “Nay” voters in the Senate for the vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and who should never have been on the GOP ticket that year, IMO. And the election results confirm that America, as a whole, felt the same way. And some others, still, will want to talk about Lee Atwater and the “Southern Strategy”, which is a pretty important part of this discussion, but which will have to be covered in subsequent articles. In the mean time, think of Lee Atwater as COMRADE Atwater.
Before we get into all of that, let me ask you, my readers, why you think Democrats ever defended Senator Byrd.  I will tell you why, in my opinion.  They defended him for the same reason the Republicans defended Barry Goldwater or Lee Atwater or now defend Donald Trump.
So, let me tell you about my parents. From 1960-1964, they lived in East Lansing, Michigan, while my father finished his Master’s degree and his Ph.D. and my mother worked as an elementary school teacher. My grandparents very generously purchased their first house for them. Their neighbors and good friends were an African American couple living next door, who were also starting a new family. I tend to think of my parents as pretty typical, middle-class, white Americans in most ways. I believe they’d probably agree with me. To kind of explain how my parents raised me, they taught me that the “N” word is more vile and reprehensible than the “C” word. When I hear the word spoken, I wince. It’s just a word that is so vastly alien from my view of African Americans that I just don’t feel comfortable with it’s use, regardless of who utters it. In a nutshell, my siblings and I were raised in such a way that none of us could ever understand what possessed others to give a damn about someone’s race or gender. It was like…why would anyone care about THAT?
It took me months to get through to them about Trump, who I first wrote about in December of 2015. But I finally got through to them, just before the elections.
So let’s talk about elections.
With people like my very typical, white American parents, who have never burned a cross, used the “N” word or wished ill will on someone because of their race or skin color, how do you expect they might respond to the “white racist Republican” narrative, in upcoming elections?
Let’s look at the flipside of this argument. If I want to attract registered Democrats to vote for a Conservative candidate, will I succeed in convincing them by pointing out that not one Democrat voted to free slaves? Or will that, um, maybe amplify an already bad partisan rift?
As I have mentioned in previous articles, Russian active measures employ the use of “Reflexive Control Theory” in order to provoke a desired social response. One example is how Russia, through the use of various media fronts such as Infowars and Drudge Report portrayed President Obama as a Marxist-Leninist revolutionary wishing to invoke martial law and seize everyone’s firearms or as a Muslim trying to transform the country under Sharia law. It would be difficult to quantify to what extent this impacted the 2016 elections, but it would be absurd to believe it had no impact whatsoever.
Similarly, I can only speculate about Donna Brazille’s influence on Hillary Clinton’s campaign and campaign faux pas. Was she the source of the “Deplorable” gaffe? I have my theories. Either way, Brazille’s identity politics and history with Gore and Jesse Jackson may mean little to most people, but having gained some skill in identifying agents of influence, I would have to believe that the intelligence community has come to the same conclusions about Brazille that I have come to.
So there are additional reasons I have concerns about identity politics, particularly as we inch closer to the 2020 elections.
Unfortunately, my concerns are based on yet MORE information my readers aren’t going to like.  Sigh…and another article I REALLY don’t want to write.
AHEM, Twitter Safety?

AHEM, Twitter Safety?

A new comment on my website…

Link: https://www.russiarevealed.info/the-horseshoe-rears-its-ugly-head-again-let-it-inform-you-not-distract-you/

Funny, this is EXACTLY how I got kicked off Twitter.

These warm seasons greetings came a day late for Christmas.

Link: https://www.russiarevealed.info/d-matthew-stewart-the-guy-linked-with-whitey-bolgers-thriving-network-who-made-my-shitlist-part-one/

The Horseshoe Rears Its Ugly Head Again: Let It Inform You, Not Distract You

The Horseshoe Rears Its Ugly Head Again: Let It Inform You, Not Distract You

So I woke up late this morning, to find yet more evidence of Russia’s Horseshoe Theory, played out in the news.

And here’s the link to the story, BTW… https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/28/trump-jay-z-black-unemployment-373779

You’ll have to forgive our predictable opposition in Moscow, but they have, after all, only a finite number of agents of influence to play this game with.

If you have followed me for awhile, you know that Jay-Z’s name has come up in conversation before (also here).

So this morning’s back and forth between Trump and Jay-Z is a perfect example of Kremlin mindfuckery. Jay-Z and Trump are not on opposite sides. They’re playing a dialectic, to disinform. There is no issue between them. The point is to convince you, the news consumer, that there is. Jay-Z is, in the truest sense, phony opposition. And the general idea here is to continue to drive a wedge between the Left-wing and the Right-wing and ignore both Jay-Z’s and Trump’s associations with Russian organized crime.

If we focus on Trump the “racist”, we’re not focused on Trump’s (or Jay-Z’s) involvement with organized crime.


And Trump’s racism isn’t going to get him kicked out of the White House or sent to jail, is it?

Also, take note of the media venues who are driving the dialectic, on Google News, because I want to show you how reality is gamed, on social media.

Finally, allow me to point out a painfully obvious flaw in the “Trump is a racist” narrative.  While I have no doubt that Trump is racist, I would ask people to really think about “Trump/Bannon/etc are antisemites” and ask yourself if this really makes any sense.

Sater? Cohen? Epshtyn? Mnuchin? Kushner?

Do we REALLY believe Trump and Bannon are antisemites when they surround themselves with people of Russian Jewish heritage?

Do we REALLY believe these people’s associations in Brighton Beach and Palm Beach make them antisemites?

Or, are they in fact associated with the Russian mafia? This is simple history here. And SHAME on the news media for not informing the general public.

JUST…READ…THIS…and understand that Ivankov, who is mentioned, lived in the Trump Towers:


Understand the HORSESHOE. Stop thinking in terms of Left vs. Right and visa versa.  This is about ORGANIZED CRIME, NOT RACISM.

Guy Linked With Organized Crime Figures Harasses #NeverRussia Patriot Rick Wilson

ICYMI: Trump’s longtime business partner, Felix Sater, has longstanding ties to Russia’s “boss of bosses” Semion Mogilevich.

Here’s the deal. It’s been three days since Dianne Feinstein released Glenn Simpson’s testimony to the public. Three days since the media and the public were made aware of this information yet again.

The testimony (seen above) made it clear that President Donald Trump’s longtime business partner, Felix Sater, is closely tied to the most powerful mobster in the world, Semyon Mogilevich. Plenty of intelligence experts take issue with the Dossier, Fusion GPS and their explosive claims. I have my own reservations about plenty of Simpson’s testimony and the Dossier itself. We should be cautious and take nothing at face value. However, there are two things I’d like to point out.

  1. This is not the first time Felix Sater has been linked to Semion Mogilevich. Felix’s dad was a boss in Uzbekistan for the Mogilevich Organization. This is known.
  2. The media LOVES to talk about the Dossier. They love to talk about the provokatsiya known as the “pee-pee” tapes. There was, as you would expect, plenty of hype surrounding the unexpected release of Glenn Simpson’s testimony. It got lots of short-lived coverage Yet, still, has the MSM mentioned Semion Mogilevich’s direct connection to Donald Trump yet?

No. So, why the hell not?

The media has gotten close. The Daily Beast reported on Paul Manafort’s money laundering ties to a man named Ivan Fursin, who is one step removed from Semion Mogilevich. There have also been reports of Paul Manafort’s ties to Ivan Fursin’s business partner, Dmitry Firtash, and a failed hotel deal they worked on together with Fred Trump’s (yes, Fred Trump, Donald Trump’s dad) money man, Brad Zackson.

Dmitry Firtash, a billionaire Kremlin-friendly oligarch, has admitted he only managed to be in business in the first place because Semion Mogilevich allowed him to be.

Yet, still, we wait for the media to say Semion Mogilevich’s name.

You may recall that, in addition to being Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort lived in Trump Tower. Manafort’s longstanding business ties to Donald Trump are extensively covered here.

Yet, still, we wait for the media to catch up to, potentially, one of the biggest stories ever told: Donald Trump, our president, is a longtime money-launderer who remains beholden to the Russian mob’s “boss of bosses” Semion Mogilevich.

Maybe too many in the MSM are compromised. Maybe too many in the MSM aren’t really workings as journalists in the first place. However you slice it, something is very wrong with this picture, isn’t it? How is this the state of journalism right now?

Remember, Paul Manafort tried to publish a positive op-ed recently, with a Russian intelligence officer, no less.

Felix Sater has paid for puff pieces about himself. Sater has also been caught trying to pay for hit pieces to be written about his enemies.

These men play by their own rules. The Russian mob’s rules, to be exact.

Felix Sater was Donald Trump’s business partner by 2003, at the very latest.

When Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump visited Moscow in 2006, who went with them? Felix Sater did, and Sater even says he arranged for Ivanka to sit on Vladimir Putin’s chair in his office in the Kremlin. Notably, Ivanka Trump does not deny Sater’s claim.

When Donald Trump tried to reach an agreement to build Trump Tower Moscow during the presidential campaign, Felix Sater was the man Trump trusted to get the deal done.

When Donald Trump and his campaign had an invite-only election night party, who was in attendance? Felix Sater was, of course!

In January of 2017, when the Trump administration tried to setup a “Ukraine peace plan” on terms favorable to the Kremlin, Felix Sater was one of the men they turned to.

Felix Sater’s relationship with Semion Mogelivich never ended. Neither did Felix Sater’s relationship with Donald Trump.

Keep saying his name, even if the media won’t do it themselves.

We can’t afford not to, because the Russian mob wants it all.

You can visit citjourno.org for more information on everything I’ve discussed.

One way or another, this story isn’t going away. We’ll make sure of that.



From the Fusion GPS testimony…


%d bloggers like this: